A Community List of Free Tabletop Roleplaying Resources
Story by Geoffrey · 354 readers
A new Codeberg repository gathers free tabletop resources, with an emphasis on open licenses and community suggestions.


Finding useful tabletop material can take as long as putting it to work at the table. A new community list aims to make that search easier: its creator has opened a Codeberg repository for free roleplaying resources, spanning systems and genres. The collection is still incomplete, but its focus on material that can be reused gives it a practical purpose beyond simply gathering interesting links.
The list is available as a web page, and the repository is hosted at https://codeberg.org/kyonshi/Tabletop-Roleplaying-Resources. The creator describes the project as a place to collect free resources from across the web. That broad remit could make it useful to game masters looking beyond the usual recommendations, as well as designers looking for material they can adapt for their own work.
A directory with reuse in mind
The curator hopes to include mostly resources with open licenses or public domain status. That distinction matters when a resource is more than a source of inspiration. A game master might want to share a handout with a group, while a designer could be looking for material they can incorporate into something they plan to publish. In those cases, knowing that a resource permits reuse can shape what people are able to do with it.
The description doesn’t claim that every listing already meets a single, fully settled standard. The creator says they’re still considering whether their selection process is rigorous enough for the established directories that inspired the project. For now, the stated preference for open licensing offers readers a helpful guide to what the collection is aiming for, while leaving room for the list and its approach to develop.
That makes this an early resource worth approaching as a growing index, rather than a complete catalogue. The creator acknowledges that plenty is missing. For anyone browsing, that’s a useful expectation: the directory can help surface material, but its current contents won’t cover every system, genre, or kind of play. A missing link doesn’t mean a resource is unsuitable; it may simply not have reached the list yet.
Readers can help fill the gaps
Suggestions are welcome by email or through a pull request to the repository. That invitation gives readers a direct way to improve the directory when they find a resource that fits its purpose. A contribution can also help clarify the range the list serves: different groups bring different systems, play styles, and creative needs to their searches.
Before suggesting a resource, it’s worth checking what its license allows, especially if the material may be reused in a published project. “Free” can describe access without necessarily granting permission to republish or adapt. The curator’s preference for open licenses and public domain material signals that reuse matters here, but readers should still consult each resource’s own terms before building on it.
The repository format also gives the collection a home where people can suggest additions directly. That can make a community list more responsive than a static roundup, provided contributors share relevant links and the curator can assess them. The article doesn’t spell out a detailed review checklist, so readers should treat any submission as a suggestion for consideration rather than an automatic inclusion.
Other directories serve narrower needs
This new list is intended for specific resources, not every useful discussion or house rule. The creator points readers toward Links to Wisdom for interesting blog posts and house rules related to OSR games. That narrower focus is handy when the goal is to read how other players and referees approach a particular style of play.
For spacefaring games such as Traveller, the creator recommends Uplinked Intelligence. Readers looking specifically for scenarios can also visit Adventures. These references point to different kinds of browsing: discussion and table rules, resources for a particular genre, or ready-to-run scenarios.
Together, the directories show why a broad index and specialized collections can both be useful. The new Codeberg list aims to gather free resources across systems and genres, while the linked pages give readers a more focused route into particular subjects. For game masters planning a session, that may mean checking a scenario directory first; for designers, the new list’s attention to reuse may be the more relevant starting point.
The clearest next step is simple: browse the list, check the terms attached to anything you want to reuse, and pass along useful omissions. Its value will depend on the quality and range of what people contribute. Since the creator already describes the collection as incomplete, readers who find a good resource have a concrete way to help make the next visit more useful.